Adrian, E. D. The basis of sensation. London: Christophers, 1928
Allport, D. A. Phenomenal simu1taneity and the perceptual moment hypothesis. Brit. J. Psychol., 1968, 59, 395- 406.
Alpern, M. Relation of visual latency to intensity. A, M. A. Arch. Opthal., 1954, 5l, 369-374.
Arden, G. B., and Weale, R. A. Variations of the latent period of vision. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., 1954, 142B, 258-266 .
Bowen, R. W., Pola, B., and Martin, L. Visual persistence: effects of flash luminance, duration, energy. Vis. Res., 1974, 14, 295-303.
Boynton, R. M. Some temporal factors in vision. In W. A. Rosenblith (ed.) Sensory Communication. New York: Wiley, 1961, 739-756.
Breitmeyer, B., Love, R., and Wepman, B. Contour suppression during stroboscopic motion and metacontrast. Vis. Res., 1974, 14, 1451-1456
Crawford, B. H. Visual adaptation in relation to brief conditioning stimuli. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., 1947, 134B, 283-302.
Dember, W. N. The Psychology of Perception. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, I965.
Dember, W. N., and Purcell, D. G. Recovery of masked visual targets by inhibition of the masking stimulus. Science, 1967, 157, 1335-1336
Donchin, E. Retroactive visual masking: Effects of test flash duration on the masking interval. Vis. Res., 1967, 1, 79-87.
Donchin, E., and Lindsley, D. B. Retroactive brightness enhancement with brief paired flashes of light. Vis. Res. , E,
{71}
Efron, R. The effect of stimulus intensity on the perception of simultaneity in right and left handed subjects. Brain, 1963a, 86, Part II, 285-294.
Efron, R. An extension of the Pulfrich stereoscopic effect. Brain, 1963b, 86, Part II, 295-300.
Efron, R. Artificial synthesis of evoked responses to light. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1964, 112, 292-304.
Efron, R. The duration of the present. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1967, 138, 713-729.
Efron, R. The relationship between the duration of a stimulus and the duration of a perception. Neuropsychologia, 1970a, S, 37-55.
Efron, R. The minimum duration of a perception. Neuropsychologia, 1970b, 8, 57-63. ‘
Efron, B. An invariant characteristic of perceptual systems -in the time domain. Attention and Performance IV, New York: Academic Press, 1973, 713-736
Fehrer, E. Effect of stimulus similarity on retroactive masking. J. Exp. Psychol., 1966, 71, 612-615.
Fehrer, E., and Biederman, I. A comparison of reaction time and verbal report in the detection of masked stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol., 1962, 64, 126-130.
Fehrer, E., and Raab, D. Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast. J. Exp. Psychol., 1962, SS, 143-147.
Fehrer, E., and Smith, E. Effect of luminance ratio on masking. Percept. Mot. Skills, 1962, 14, 243-253.
Grossman, S. P. A textbook of physiological psychology. New York: WiIey, I937.
Haber, R. N., and Standing, L. G. Direct estimates of the apparent duration of a flash. Canadian J. Psych., 1970, 24, 216-229.
Harrison, K., and Fox, R. Replication of reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast. J. Exp. Psychol. 1966, 71, 162-163.
Hershenson, M. Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation. J. Exp. Psychol., 1962, 63, 289-293.
Hirsh, I. J., and Sherrick, C. E., Jr. Perceived order in different sense modalities. J. Exp. Psychol., 1961 62, 423-432..
{72}
Hogben, J. H., and Lollo, V. di, Perceptual integration and perceptual segregation of brief visual stimuli. Vis. Res., 1974, 14, 1059-1069
Julesz, B., and White, B. Short term visual memory and the Pulfrich phenomenon. Nature, 1969, 222, 639-641.
Kahneman, D. An onset-onset law for one case of apparent motion and metacontrast. Percept. Psychophys. 1967, 2, 557-583.
Kahneman, D. Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. Psychol. Bull., 1968, 69, 404-425.
Kandel, G. L. A psychophysical study of some monocular and binocular factors in early adaptation. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of Rochester, 1958.
Katz, M. S. The perceived brightness of light flashes. Doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, 1959.
Kaswan, J. and Young, S. Effect of luminance, exposure duration and task complexity on reaction time. J. Exp. Psychol., 1965, 69, 393-399.
Keitzman, M. L. Two-pulse measures of temporal resolution as a function of stimulus energy. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1967, 57, 809-813.
Keitzman, M. L. and Sutton, S. The interpretation of two-pulse measures of temporal resolution in vision. Vis. Res., 1968, 8, 287-302.
Kolers, P. A. Intensity and contour effects in visual masking. Vis. Res., 1962, 2, 277-294.
Lefton L. A. Metacontrast: a review. Percept. Psychophys. 1973, 13, 161-171.
Lewis, M. F. Two-flash thresholds as a function of luminance in the dark adapted-eye. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1967, 57, 814-815.
Lindsley, D. B. Psychophysiology and perception. In: Current trends in description and analysis of behavior. Pittsburgh: Univ. Pittsburg Press, I958.
Lit, A. The magnitude of the Pulfrich stereophenomenon as a function of binocular differences of intensity at various levels of illumination. Amer. J. Psychol.1949, 62, 159-181
{73}
Merleau-Ponty, M. The Structure of Behavior. (1942) Trans. by A. L. Fisher. Boston: Beacon Press, 1963.
Michotte, A. The perception of Causality. London: Muthuen, 1963.
Nilsson, T. H. Two-pulse-interval vision thresholds. J. Opt Soc. Amer., 1969, 59, 753-756.
Pollack, R. H. Effects of figure-ground contrast and contour orientation on figural masking. Psychon. Sci. ,1965, 2, 369-370.
Prestrude, A. M., and Baker, H. D. New method of measuring visual-perceptual latency differences. Percept. and Psychophysics, 1968, 4, 152-154.
Raab, D. H. Backward masking. Psychol. Bull., 1963, 60, 118-129.
Raab, D. H., and Fehrer, E. Supplementary report: The effect of stimulus duration and luminance on visual reaction time. J. Exp. Psychol., 1962, 64, 326-327.
Raab, D. H., Fehrer, E., and Hershenson, M. Visual reaction time and the Broca-Su1zer phenomenon. J. Exp. Psychol. 1961, 61, 193-199.
Raab. D. H., and Osman, E. Effect of temporal overlap on brightness matching of adjacent flashes. J, Opt. Soc. Amer., 1962, 52, 1174-1178.
Ratliff, F. Inhibitory interaction and the detection and enhancement of contours. In: W. A. Rosenblith (ed.) Sensory Communication. New York: Wiley, 1961, 183-203.
Robinson, D. N. Disinhibition of visually masked stimuli. Science, 1966, 154, 157-158.
Robinson, D. N. Visual disinhibition with binocular and interocular presentations. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1968, SS, 254-257
Roufs, J. A. J. Perception lag as a function of stimulus Luminance. Vis. Res., 1963, 3, 81-91
Schiller, P. H., and Smith, M. C. A comparison of forward and backward masking. Psychon. Sci., 1965, 3, 77-78.
Schiller, P. H., and Smith, M. C. Detection in metacontrast. J. Exp. Psychol., 1966, 71, 32-39.
{74}
Schiller, P. H., and Chorover, S. L. Metacontrast: its relation to evoked potentials. Science, 1966, 153, 1398-1401.
Stainton, W. H. The phenomenon of Broca-Sulzer in foveal vision. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1928, 16, 26-39.
Stoper, A. E., and Banffy, S. Relation of split apparent motion to metacontrast. J. E. P: Human Percept. and Perform., 1977, 3, 258-277.
Sturr, J. F., Frumkes, T. E., and Veneruso, D. M. Spatial determinants of visual masking: effects of mask size and retinal position. Psychon. Sci., 1965, 3, 327- 328.
Thor, D. H. Observer Strategies in dichoptic viewing of successive stimuli. Psychon. Sci.; 1968, 12, 41-42.
Uttal, W. R. Masking of alphabetic character recognition by -ultrahigh-density dynamic visual noise. Percept. and Psychophysics, 1970a, 7, 19-22.
Uttal, W. R. Violations of visual simultaneity. Percept. and Psychophysics, 1970b, 7, 133-135.
Uttal, W. R. On the physiological basis of masking with dotted visual noise. Percept. and Psychophysics 1970c, 7, 321-327.
Weisstein, N. A Rashevsky-Landal Neural net: simulation of metacontrast. Psych. Rev., 1968, 75, 494-521.
Werner, H. Studies on contour: I. Qualitative analyses. Amer. J. Psychol., 1935, 47, 40-64.
White, C. W. Visual masking during pursuit eye movements. J. E. P: Human Percept. and Perform., 1976 2, 469- 478
Wilson, M. E. Spatial and temporal summation in defective fields of vision. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of London, 1965.
Latest revision: April 8, 2014 5:25 pm
bioperipatetic 